The media have published the news of holding a trial in the Provincial Court of Valladolid, against an attorney who allegedly falsified court papers his client . In the news refer to the accused with his entire compound name and initial of their surnames. You mention your job in a department of the Faculty of Law, University of Valladolid.
I wonder if the journalist who has written the story, to give the information, intended identify the defendant or not.
If you sought was not identified, has gone very wrong. With so much data as is provided, anyone can learn the identity of this person without any effort. We will not help (even more) to your identification, but without doing any research, anyone who has gone through the Faculty of Law, Valladolid already know who it is. Not to mention if you use the Internet or any document evidencing School faculty.
If you wanted the news editor was identified, it has very OK, but would not have made any difference if he had given his full name, because the person concerned is fully identified.
LOPD According to a personal data is "any information concerning an identified or identifiable natural person." I think it's pretty clear that this information has made this person readily identifiable, and it effortlessly. The media should be more careful with these types of situations, and understand that identifying the defendant adds nothing to the news.
PS.: Due to the lack of discretion of the editor, I can say that this is a great teacher, I have a very good memory and who wish him the best possible ending to this story.
0 comments:
Post a Comment